A structured tool for deciding the right maintenance approach for each asset in your facility — before you build a PM schedule, not after.
Most PM programs fail not because the tasks are wrong, but because the wrong assets got PMs in the first place. This matrix helps you make an explicit, defensible decision about maintenance mode for each asset — rather than defaulting to "put a PM on everything" or "we'll cross that bridge when it breaks."
| Column | What to Record |
|---|---|
| Criticality (1–5) | How bad is it if this asset fails unexpectedly? Use the 5-point scale in Part 4. When in doubt, ask: "Would this stop the line, affect safety, or trigger a regulatory issue?" |
| Failure Predictable? | Y if the asset typically shows a detectable warning before failure (noise, heat, vibration, wear). N if failure is sudden with no lead time. |
| Detection Lead Time | If predictable, how much advance notice does a warning typically give? Hours, days, weeks. If not predictable, write "None." |
| PM Cost | Estimated labor + parts cost for one PM cycle. Use ballpark figures — the goal is to compare relative magnitude to failure cost, not accounting precision. |
| Failure Cost | Estimated cost of one unplanned failure: parts, labor, downtime, scrap/rework, expediting. Include production loss if it's significant. |
| Recommended Mode | RTF (Run-to-Failure), TBP (Time-Based PM), or CBM (Condition-Based Monitoring). Use the Reference card to decide. Write your reasoning in the Notes column if the decision isn't obvious. |
| Current Mode | What are you actually doing today? If there's no PM and it runs until it breaks, that's RTF whether intentional or not. |
| Gap? | Y if Recommended Mode differs from Current Mode. These are your action items. |
Print this in landscape orientation for the best fit. The matrix is designed to work as a working document — bring it to a planning meeting and fill it in collaboratively with your lead technicians. They know which assets behave unpredictably better than any CMMS report will show.
Rows shaded in green are pre-filled examples showing how the matrix works. Complete the blank rows for your facility's assets. Add additional sheets as needed.
| Asset Name | Criticality (1–5) |
Failure Predictable? (Y/N) |
Detection Lead Time |
PM Cost (est.) |
Failure Cost (est.) |
Recommended Mode |
Current Mode |
Gap? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example Main air compressor |
5 | Y | 1–2 weeks (vibration / temp rise) | $180/qtr | $8,000+ | CBM | TBP (quarterly) | Y | Vibration trending would catch bearing wear earlier; quarterly PM may be over-frequent |
| Example Forklift battery charger #3 |
2 | N | None | $40/yr | $200 unit cost + 1 hr labor | RTF | RTF | N | Low criticality, cheap to replace, no warning — intentional RTF is correct |
| Example Chiller #1 (production cooling) |
4 | Y | Days to weeks (refrigerant pressure, approach temp) | $350/semi-annual | $15,000 + 2–3 days downtime | TBP + CBM | TBP (annual) | Y | Annual interval too long given criticality; add refrigerant pressure trending monthly |
Use this card when filling in the "Recommended Mode" column. The three modes are not a hierarchy — each is correct in the right context. The goal is intentional selection, not defaulting to the same mode for every asset.
Many high-criticality assets benefit from both TBP and CBM. A quarterly PM plus monthly vibration checks is a legitimate hybrid — the PM handles known wear items, the CBM catches unexpected degradation between intervals. Record this as "TBP + CBM" in the Recommended Mode column.
Criticality measures the consequence of unexpected failure — not how complex the asset is or how often it's worked on. Score every asset on this single question: "What happens if this asset fails right now, with no warning?"
Score criticality based on consequences, not likelihood of failure. A boiler may be inherently reliable — but its criticality is still 5 because failure would stop the facility. Score based on the worst credible outcome, not the expected one. Use criticality to allocate your PM attention budget: Criticality 4–5 assets should receive the most rigorous maintenance mode selection, the most thorough PM tasks, and the most frequent condition monitoring.
The Decision Matrix helps you choose the right maintenance mode for each asset. The Preventive Maintenance Playbook gives you everything else: PM task templates for 40+ equipment types calibrated by criticality level, scheduling frameworks, interval-setting methodology based on failure history, CMMS work order structure, and a full KPI dashboard. $99.
See the Playbook →Companion article: uptimesystemshub.com/articles/pm-planning/ · © 2026 Equipment Uptime Systems